Open Access Peer Reviewed COPE Aligned DOI Registered Version of Record

Official Article Landing Page

Comparative Study of Customs, Traditions, and Legal Procedures Related to Marriage and Divorce in Hindu and Muslim Traditions

International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Social Sciences Research International Open Access, Peer-reviewed, Refereed Journal

Google Scholar indexing depends on Google Scholar’s crawl schedule. Verify DOI opens the external DOI resolver.

Abstract

This research paper presents a comparative analysis of the process, religious beliefs, customs, and legal provisions related to marriage and divorce in Hindu and Muslim traditions. In a multi-religious country like India, the rules of marriage and divorce not only vary according to religion but also influence social structures, gender roles, and individual rights. In Hinduism, marriage is considered a sacred sacrament, believed to be a bond spanning multiple lifetimes, whereas in Islam, marriage is regarded as a social contract. Based on these different religious perspectives, the procedures for divorce also vary. In Hindu marriage, divorce is a judicial process based on mutual consent, cruelty, adultery, etc. In contrast, Muslim marriage recognizes religious methods such as Talaq-e-Ahsan, Talaq-e-Hasan, Khula, and Mubarat. However, Triple Talaq (Talaq-e-Biddat) has been declared unconstitutional in India. This study also highlights the reforms made by the modern Indian judicial system to protect women's rights in both religions. Overall, this study helps in understanding the religious, social, and legal complexities of marriage and divorce and underscores the impact of religion-based matrimonial laws in India.

Official DOI Landing Verification

This is the official published Version of Record. DOI status: Registered.

DOI StatusRegistered
PDF StatusAvailable
LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0
MetadataMachine-readable
VersionVersion of Record
Article IntegrityVerified
DOI Record StatusRegistered
Google Scholar StatusMetadata Ready
Peer ReviewCompleted

Article Metadata

Article IDIJLHSSR-V2I3-048
Article TypeReview Article
Volume2
Issue3
Pages1-27
Published10 August 2026
LanguageEnglish
ISSN3139-406X
DOI Prefix10.65919
PublisherUnivColl Publications
Access ModelOpen Access
Peer ReviewDouble-Blind
LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0
Article DOI10.65919/ijlhssr.2026.v2i3001

Authors & Affiliations

* Corresponding Author. Author contact details are available in the published PDF article as per journal policy.

Received 20 May 2026
Accepted 29 June 2026
Published 10 August 2026

Keywords & Indexing Terms

Download Center

Indexing & Verification

Article Metrics

Article Views76
PDF Downloads10
Total Pages27

Metrics are indicative and may update periodically after indexing, downloads and citation tracking are enabled.

Article Integrity & Transparency

Peer ReviewDouble Blind
Plagiarism CheckCompleted
COPE ComplianceFollowed
Correction StatusNo correction issued
Retraction StatusNot retracted
VersionVersion of Record

License & Copyright

CC BY-NC 4.0

© 2026 The Author(s). The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .

How to Cite

Arun Kumar, Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain (2026). Comparative Study of Customs, Traditions, and Legal Procedures Related to Marriage and Divorce in Hindu and Muslim Traditions. International Journal of Law, Human Rights and Social Sciences Research, 2(3), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.65919/ijlhssr.2026.v2i3001

PDF Preview

If the PDF preview does not load on your device, open the PDF directly or use the Download PDF button. Open PDF in new tab

Declarations

Funding

No external funding information has been declared unless stated in the published PDF.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest unless otherwise stated in the article.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval status is as per the article and journal policy.

Data Availability

Data availability is as declared by the author(s) in the published article.

Author Contributions

Author contributions are recorded as per submitted manuscript and editorial records.

AI-use Declaration

AI-use declaration is governed by journal policy and author disclosure.

Publisher's Note

  • ✓ The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the author(s).
  • ✓ Publication of this article does not imply endorsement by IJLHSSR, the editorial board or the publisher.
  • ✓ Responsibility for the accuracy, originality and integrity of the work remains with the author(s).
  • ✓ Readers are encouraged to independently evaluate and verify the information before application or citation.
  • ✓ IJLHSSR and UnivColl Publications shall not be held liable for any consequences arising from the use of the published content.

References

Showing first 3 references. Click “Show All References” to view complete list.

  1. 1. Matilal, B. K. (2002). Ethics and epistemology in classical Indian philosophy. Oxford University Press.
  2. 2. Manusmṛti. (n.d.). Chapter 9, Verse 45. In G. Jha (Trans.), Manusmṛti: English translation with critical notes. Motilal Banarsidass.
  3. 3. Diwan, P. (2011). Indian family law (10th ed.). Allahabad Law Agency.
  4. 4. Mahmood, T. (2012). Muslim law in India and abroad. LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa.
  5. 5. Fyzee, A. A. A. (2009). Outlines of Muhammadan law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  6. 6. Shayara Bano v. Union of India & Ors., (2017) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1 (India).
  7. 7. Mulla, D. F. (2020). Principles of Mahomedan law (22nd ed.). LexisNexis.
  8. 8. Menski, W. (2003). Hindu law: Beyond tradition and modernity. Oxford University Press.
  9. 9. Mayne, J. D. (2016). Hindu law and usage (16th ed.). Bharat Law House.
  10. 10. Kumari, R. (2017). Study of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: A review. Universal Research Reports, 4(2), 45–52.
  11. 11. Apastamba, & Aśvalāyana. (1997). Gṛhya Sūtras (H. Oldenberg, Trans.). Motilal Banarsidass.
  12. 12. Radhakrishnan, S. (1951). Indian philosophy (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). George Allen & Unwin.
  13. 13. Ṛg Veda. . Mandala 10, Hymn 85 (Vivāha Sūkta). In R. T. H. Griffith (Trans.), The hymns of the Rigveda. Motilal Banarsidass.
  14. 14. Jha, G. (Trans.). (1999). Manusmṛti: English translation with commentary. Motilal Banarsidass.
  15. 15. Derrett, J. D. M. (1968). Religion, law and the state in India. Oxford University Press.
  16. 16. Gupta, A. K. (n.d.). The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in India: Review. Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies.
  17. 17. T. Sareetha v. T. Venkata Subbaiah, AIR 1983 Andhra Pradesh 356 (India).
  18. 18. Live Law Hindi. (1888). Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act: Essential conditions and their importance for a valid marriage. LiveLaw Hindi.
  19. 19. Banerji, O. (1989). Valid marriage under Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act. iPleaders.
  20. 20. Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India, AIR 1985 Supreme Court 1616 (India).
  21. 21. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: A critical analysis of divorce and maintenance provisions. . Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research.
  22. 22. Chaturvedi, R. N. (2014). Law of marriage and divorce in India. Central Law Publications.
  23. 23. Srinivasan. (2018). Special Marriage Act, 1954 (4th ed.). Law Publishers (India) Pvt. Ltd.
  24. 24. Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India, AIR 1995 Supreme Court 1531 (India).
  25. 25. Altekar, A. S. (1958). Hindu social institutions. Motilal Banarsidass.
  26. 26. Mulla, D. F. (2018). Mulla Hindu law (22nd ed.). LexisNexis.
  27. 27. Maine, H. J. S. (1861). Ancient law: Its connection with the early history of society, and its relation to modern ideas. John Murray.
  28. 28. Sharma, S. . Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Legal provisions, application, and key features. Legal Service India.
  29. 29. Mitra, B. B. (2016). Modern Hindu law. Eastern Book Company.
  30. 30. Sharma, K. K. (2017). Hindu law. Central Law Publications.
  31. 31. Kumar, R. (2017). [Article on personal laws]. Universal Research Reports, 4(10), 26–30.
  32. 32. Elliot, H. M., & Dowson, J. (1867–1877). The history of India as told by its own historians (Vols. 1–8). Trübner & Co.
  33. 33. Kozlowski, G. C. (1985). Muslim judicial organization in pre-colonial India. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 105(4), 535–544.
  34. 34. Hallaq, W. B. (1994). From fatwās to furūʿ: Growth and change in Islamic substantive law. Islamic Law and Society, 1(1), 29–65.
  35. 35. Diwan, P. (2001). Muslim law in modern India. Allahabad Law Agency.
  36. 36. Agnes, F. (2011). Personal laws in India: The paradox of secularism. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(43), 98–104.
  37. 37. Rahim, A. (2014). The principles of Muhammadan jurisprudence. Kitab Bhavan.
  38. 38. Mahmood, T. (2016). Muslim law in India. Universal Law Publishing.
  39. 39. Marriage (nikah) under Muslim law. (n.d.). Gyansanchay, Chhatrapati Shahu Ji Maharaj University.
  40. 40. Dissolution of Muslim marriage: Legal remedies. (n.d.). Wikipedia.
  41. 41. Khan, M. H. (2018). Muslim law in India. Central Law Publications.
  42. 42. Quran. (n.d.). Surah An-Nur (24:32).
  43. 43. Ali, S. A. A. (2014). Mohammedan law (Vol. II, 4th ed.). Kitab Bhavan.
  44. 44. Schacht, J. (1982). An introduction to Islamic law. Oxford University Press.
  45. 45. Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1 (India).
  46. 46. Baillie, N. B. E. (1869). A digest of Mohammedan law (Vol. I). Smith, Elder & Co.
  47. 47. Shah, I. A. (2010). Islamic law of marriage. Eastern Law House.
  48. 48. Khan, M. H. (2018). Muslim law in India. Central Law Publications.
  49. 49. LawArticle.in. (n.d.). Muslim marriage in India: Conditions, formalities, and registration. Retrieved from https://lawarticle.in/muslim-marriage-in-india-conditions-formalities-and-registration/
  50. 50. Al-Marghinani, B. (1994). Al-Hidayah: Commentary on Islamic laws (C. Hamilton, Trans.). Kitab Bhavan.
  51. 51. Ali, S. A. A. (2015). Mohammedan law (Vols. I–II). Kitab Bhavan.
  52. 52. Al Lahibi, H. B. B. H. (2019). The presence of witnesses in the marriage contract in Islamic jurisprudence. Beni Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 35(4), 1–10.
  53. 53. Fyzee, A. A. A. (2009). Outlines of Muhammadan law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  54. 54. Imran, M. (n.d.). Nikah-halala in India: Practice, precept, and perception. Cambridge Open Engage.
  55. 55. Quran. (n.d.). Surah An-Nisa (4:3).
  56. 56. Waheeda, W., Aziz, A., & Mutakin, A. (2023). Polygamy in Islamic jurisprudence: Scholarly perspectives, regulations, and justice. ALFIQH Islamic Law Review Journal, 2(1), 45–62.
  57. 57. Fahira, S. H. (2025). The issue of polygamy in Islamic family law: Between tradition and gender justice on the international stage. Journal of Islamic Family Law, 7(1), 1–18.
  58. 58. Pamula, F. R., Sayehu, & Torihoran, N. (2025). Polygamy in Islamic law: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 6(2), 55–78.
  59. 59. Mulla, D. F. (2020). Principles of Mohammedan law (22nd ed.). LexisNexis.
  60. 60. Divorce, maintenance, and personal law protections for Muslim women in India. (n.d.). Journal of Law and Legal Research Development.
  61. 61. Independent Thought v. Union of India, (2017) 10 Supreme Court Cases 800 (India).
  62. 62. Gender-based discrimination and legal protections for Muslim women under personal laws. (n.d.). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.
  63. 63. Verma, B. R. (2016). Muhammadan law (5th ed.). Law Publishers (India).
  64. 64. Gupta, D. (2024). Exploring the legal and socio-cultural dimensions of marriage dissolution: A comparative analysis of Hindu and Muslim personal laws. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3), 1–15.
  65. 65. Manusmṛti. (n.d.). Chapter IX. In G. Jha (Trans.), Manusmṛti: English translation with commentary. Motilal Banarsidass.
  66. 66. Singh, R. P. (2025). The legal evolution of dissolution: An analysis of divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 5(1), 22–40.
  67. 67. Desai, S. A. (2014). Personal laws of Hindus. Oxford University Press.
  68. 68. Rawat, A. S., & Ali, H. (2024). Analysis of grounds of divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act. International Journal of Applied Research, 10(2), 112–118.
  69. 69. Agnes, F. (2011). Family law and constitutional claims. Oxford University Press.
  70. 70. Jain, S. (n.d.). Divorce by mutual consent under Hindu law: A socio-legal study. Journal of the Indian Law Institute.
  71. 71. Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 Supreme Court Cases 746 : AIR 2017 Supreme Court 4417 (India).
  72. 72. Saxena, P. P. (2013). Family law lectures: Family law II. LexisNexis.
  73. 73. Paranjape, N. V. (2015). Indian family law. Central Law Agency.
  74. 74. Altekar, A. S. (1956). The position of women in Hindu civilization. Motilal Banarsidass.
  75. 75. Gandhi, B. M. (2014). Hindu law. Eastern Book Company.
  76. 76. Derrett, J. D. M. (1968). Religion, law and the state in India. Oxford University Press.
  77. 77. LawArticle.in. (n.d.). Muslim marriage in India: Conditions, formalities, and registration. Retrieved from https://lawarticle.in/muslim-marriage-in-india-conditions-formalities-and-registration/
  78. 78. Coulson, N. J. (1964). A history of Islamic law. Edinburgh University Press.
  79. 79. Imran, M. (n.d.). Nikah-halala in India: Practice, precept, and perception. Cambridge Open Engage.
  80. 80. Kaur, R. (n.d.). Divorce and the law: Exploring talaq-e-ahsan, talaq-e-hasan and talaq-e-biddat. The Tribune India.
  81. 81. Patel, S. (2024). Types of divorce (talaq) in Muslim law. iPleaders.
  82. 82. Khurshid, S. (2023). Triple talaq: Examining faith. Oxford University Press.
  83. 83. Mustafa, F. (2018). Islamic law and modern challenges. Eastern Book Company.
  84. 84. Rahman, S. A. (2009). The principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Book Trust.
  85. 85. Shamim Ara v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., (2002) 7 Supreme Court Cases 518 (India).
  86. 86. Ghazi, M. A. (2009). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Research Institute.
  87. 87. Sinha, R. K. (2023). Family law: Personal laws and the Special Marriage Act. Allahabad Law Agency.
  88. 88. Bhatti, S. S. (2021). Law of marriage and divorce. Thomson Reuters.
  89. 89. Bhattacharjee, T., & Sen, S. (2022). Family law. Oxford University Press India.
  90. 90. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. (2025). Vol. 5(5).
  91. 91. Kapoor, S. K. (2017). Family law in India. Central Law Publications.
  92. 92. Law Commission of India. (1978). Seventy-first report on the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955—Irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a ground for divorce. Government of India.
  93. 93. Parashar, A. (2022). Family law: Gender perspective. Central Law Publications.
  94. 94. Tiwari, D., & Pandey, S. (2021). Contemporary family law: Theory and practice. LexisNexis.
  95. 95. Hasan, Z., & Menon, R. (2021). Gender and law in contemporary India. Routledge India.
  96. 96. Gangoli, G. (2022). Faith, law and gender: Family law reform in global perspective. Oxford University Press India.
  97. 97. Vig, K., Arora, V., & Singh, M. (n.d.). Family law and the recent trends.
  98. 98. Arora, M., & Tripathi, S. C. (2022). Law of maintenance and other family obligations. Eastern Book Company.
  99. 99. Arora, B. (2022). A comparative study of divorce laws in India: An analytical view. Manglam Publications.

Related Articles

Publish Your Research With IJLHSSR

Submit your original research article, review paper, case study or conceptual paper to an international open access, peer-reviewed and refereed journal.

Article Transparency Report

This transparency report provides information regarding peer review, editorial evaluation, publication ethics, metadata verification, DOI registration, article integrity, licensing and scholarly publishing standards followed by IJLHSSR.

Conflict of InterestAs Declared by Author(s)
Funding SourceAs Declared in Article
AI Usage DeclarationAs Per Journal Policy
Ethical ComplianceVerified
Peer Review ModelDouble-Blind Peer Review
Editorial ScreeningCompleted
Plagiarism ScreeningCompleted
Research Integrity CheckVerified
DOI StatusRegistered
Metadata QualityMachine-Readable Metadata
Google Scholar CompatibilityMetadata Compatible
Schema.org MetadataImplemented
Dublin Core MetadataImplemented
Version StatusVersion of Record
Correction StatusNo Correction Issued
Retraction StatusNot Retracted
Access ModelOpen Access
LicenseCC BY-NC 4.0
Publication EthicsCOPE Aligned
Chat with Editor