From Protection to Participation: Reimagining Children's Rights in the Age of AI, Data Exploitation, and Transnational Cybercrime

Abstract

The digital transformation of childhood has created a fundamental paradox: while online platforms offer unprecedented access to education, creativity, and global connectivity, they simultaneously expose children to systemic risks of exploitation, privacy violations, and algorithmic manipulation. This paper critically examines this "digital childhood dilemma" by analysing the adequacy of existing legal frameworks—from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) to India's Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP), 2023, and the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—in addressing emerging threats such as AI-generated deepfakes, predatory data mining, dark web trafficking, and cross-border cybercrime. Using a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the study evaluates the gap between policy rhetoric and enforcement reality, particularly in developing nations like India, where rapid digital penetration outpaces institutional capacity. The findings reveal that current laws are predominantly reactive and punitive, failing to proactively safeguard children's participatory rights or hold technology corporations accountable for design-based harms, such as addictive interfaces, behavioural profiling, and inadequate age-verification systems. The paper proposes a holistic, child-centric framework that integrates legal reform, technological accountability, digital literacy, and international cooperation. It argues that effective protection cannot be achieved through surveillance and restriction alone; rather, it requires empowering children as digital citizens while imposing binding obligations on states and corporations to ensure safety-by-design, algorithmic transparency, and meaningful parental consent. The study concludes by advocating for a balanced regulatory approach that reconciles children's rights to protection, privacy, and participation in an increasingly AI-driven and commercially exploitative digital ecosystem, drawing on best practices from the UK's Age Appropriate Design Code, the EU's GDPR, and emerging jurisprudence in Indian courts.

Authors & Affiliations

* Corresponding Author. Author contact details are available in the published PDF article as per journal policy.

Keywords & Indexing Terms

Download Center

Indexing & Verification

G Google Scholar Check indexing visibility by DOI Crossref / DOI Verify permanent DOI record ORCID Author identifier support Open Access Free reader access Indexing Ready Scholar metadata compatible OAI-PMH Metadata harvesting ready Article Metrics Views & download analytics

Article Metrics

Metrics are indicative and may update periodically after indexing, downloads and citation tracking are enabled.

Article Integrity & Transparency

License & Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s). The author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .

How to Cite

PDF Preview

If the PDF preview does not load on your device, open the PDF directly or use the Download PDF button. Open PDF in new tab

Declarations

Publisher's Note

References

Showing first 3 references. Click “Show All References” to view complete list.

1. 1. Livingstone, S., & Byrne, J. (2018). Parenting in the digital age: The challenges of digital parenting. UNICEF Office of Research.
2. 2. UNICEF. (2017). The state of the world's children 2017: Children in a digital world. UNICEF.
3. 3. Barth, K., & Döring, N. (2022). Online sexual risks for children and adolescents: A systematic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 126, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105118
4. 4. Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., & Nandagiri, R. (2019). Children's data and privacy online: Issues and challenges. London School of Economics and Political Science.
5. 5. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2021). General Comment No. 25 on children's rights in relation to the digital environment. UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/25.
6. 6. Green, L., Holloway, D., & Livingstone, S. (2019). Regulating children's online risks: A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 21(1), 20–39.
7. 7. Montgomery, K. (2015). Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era: Policy interventions and social implications. Television & New Media, 16(2), 144–150.
8. 8. Nyst, C. (2018). Children's rights and business in a digital world: Confronting corporate responsibility. International Journal of Human Rights, 22(3), 306–326.
9. 9. Choudhury, N., & Singh, A. (2020). Cyber vulnerabilities and child safety: An Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Law and Technology, 16(1), 55–78.
10. 10. Internet Watch Foundation. (2023). Annual report: Online child sexual abuse material. IWF.
11. 11. Collier, B. (2021). Protecting children online: Balancing privacy, freedom, and safety. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 315–331.
12. 12. Kidron, B., & Rudkin, A. (2021). Digital childhood: Addressing online harms. 5Rights Foundation.
13. 13. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General Comment No. 16: State obligations regarding the impact of the business sector on children's rights. UN Doc. CRC/C/GC/16.
14. 14. National Crime Records Bureau. (2023). Crime in India: Statistics on cybercrimes against children. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
15. 15. Sharma, R., & Sinha, P. (2022). Examining child pornography laws in cyberspace: Indian and global perspectives. Journal of Law and Technology Review, 18(3), 67–89.
16. 16. Council of Europe. (2001). Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. European Treaty Series No. 185.
17. 17. Gasser, U., Maclay, C., & Palfrey, J. (2010). Working towards a deeper understanding of digital safety for children and young people in developing nations. Harvard Public Law Working Paper, No. 10-36.
18. 18. UNESCO. (2021). Artificial intelligence and child rights: Opportunities and challenges. UNESCO.
19. 19. Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). The 4Cs: Classifying online risk to children. Communications Research, 48(1), 1–20.
20. 20. Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2019). Children's rights and digital citizenship. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 22, 100–112.
21. 21. Byrne, J., Kardefelt-Winther, D., Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2016). Global kids online research synthesis, 2015–2016. UNICEF Office of Research.
22. 22. European Commission. (2022). EU strategy for a better internet for kids (BIK+). Publications Office of the European Union.
23. 23. Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. (2018). Child sexual exploitation on the internet: Trends and emerging risks. Crimes Against Children Research Center.
24. 24. OECD. (2021). Children in the digital environment: A global policy outlook. OECD Publishing.
25. 25. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations Treaty Series, 1577, 3.
26. 26. European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
27. 27. Government of India. (2000). Information Technology Act, 2000 (No. 21 of 2000).
28. 28. Government of India. (2012). Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (No. 32 of 2012).
29. 29. Government of India. (2023). Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (No. 22 of 2023).
30. 30. Information Commissioner's Office. (2020). Age Appropriate Design Code: A code of practice for age-appropriate design. UK ICO.

Related Articles